We are here to support you support your employees during COVID-19
Learn about our In-Touch employee pulse
Understanding and improving the employee experience within your organisation is an important factor that will help steer your business through cultural shifts to success.
The majority of new clients who partner with Insync to run organisational research have conducted a previous staff survey. They cite a variety of reasons for selecting us as their preferred staff survey supplier including the need for:
It is however the softer skills employed by Insync staff which our clients say are key to making their staff survey contextually relevant, such as:
These are essential best-practice requirements when administering an employee survey.
For ideas on how to invite employees to participate in the survey, you can view sample employee survey invitation templates here. Or if you want to increase your staff survey response rate, these tips can help.
Consider the questions that are already in your staff survey. If there are other matters unique to your organisation that you want to address you can and should design your own questions. Remember to think about how you want to collect the data, be it in the form of a numbered rating, open feedback or other form.
Insync’s staff survey tools have the flexibility for you to add your own questions. For ideas on how to invite employees to participate in the survey, you can view sample employee survey invitation templates here. Below are 20 examples of employee and staff survey questions constructed by past clients, that you can use to guide you.
Keep the number of open-ended questions in your staff survey to a minimum. Depending on your available time and budget, analysing open feedback can be time consuming and expensive. We suggest two or three open-ended questions. This will give you enough staff feedback to gain more value from your staff survey.
When constructing your own staff survey questions, for consistency it helps to follow the same response rating scale as the rest of your staff survey, i.e. on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 is strongly disagree and 7 is strongly agree. This makes data analysis easier and quicker.
After the survey has been conducted it’s critical to communicate the results with your staff, these sample employee survey results templates will help you offer constructive feedback.
Once analysis of results is complete, it is critical to plan a post survey action plan to show your commitment to improving the organisation, and help your staff achieve their objectives.
The following table shows how some advanced planning can help you avoid common employee survey pitfalls.
Pre-survey/existing issue | ||
Issue | Problems it causes | Mitigating actions |
| Launching the employee survey (or previous surveys) at the wrong time Example: Client X had launched an employee survey when unaddressed rumours existed among staff about an imminent corporate restructure | Bias response/data of limited validity | Don’t plan your staff survey as a stand-alone HR initiative but make it an organisation-wide project Address employees’ concerns about the restructure and survey a month or two later |
| Lack of action from previous staff surveys Example: Some new clients anecdotally report that nothing or very little was done with the results of their last staff survey | Staff scepticism that nothing will be done with staff survey results may mean low response rates and meaningless data Other managers across the organisation may not support the employee survey project and future improvement ideas | Acknowledge lack of previous inactivity and give reasons Publically state intentions for the findings for this staff survey with timescales for implementations Provide regular communication around milestones made for new staff survey initiatives |
| Respondent fatigue caused by excessive staff survey projects Example: A new client recently asked if we could boost participation rates to their employee survey; staff had been asked to complete five surveys in the last 12 months | Decreased response rate impacting robustness of staff survey data | Only use one all-staff survey at a time Timely gaps with space for insights to be translated to actions prior to follow-on staff survey projects Incentivise staff survey participation e.g. with charity donation or prize draw |
| Poor pre-survey communications Example: Emailing survey reminders to staff with no computer access, communicating the survey in languages staff struggle with, or a staff survey that’s appropriate for the senior leadership team but not operational staff | Lack of employee awareness about the staff survey | Communicate about the employee survey via multiple media channels, such as email, notice boards, letters, launch events, meetings, etc. Appoint dedicated staff survey communications champions A planned staff survey communications strategy linked to wider HR initiatives |
| Staff concerns regarding consequences of participating in the employee survey Example: Following a previous internal staff survey which was supposedly confidential, some employees had been identified and targeted by line managers regarding their responses | Low employee survey response rates False data as staff will say what they think they should say rather than what they believe | Assurances of confidentiality by using an independent third party with a formal policy for the employee surveyPre-set minimum reporting sizes Amalgamated demographics for small departments Confidential staff survey data collection methods such as unmarked, reply-paid sealed envelopes with secured and well publicised dropped boxes Secure, external hosting of electronic staff survey data |
Survey design | ||
Issue | Problems it causes | Mitigating actions |
| Lack of clarity on what you want the staff survey to achieve Example: Government funded departments and franchised employers have come to Insync citing that they must conduct a staff survey as it’s part of their contractual obligation or because “they must been seen to do so” | Employee survey findings will fail to provide clear insights leading to actionable outcomes | Be clear on what type of staff survey is required and why e.g. safety culture survey, employee engagement survey, alignment and engagement survey, entry survey and exit interview |
| Asking the wrong types of staff survey questions Example: Client Y came to Insync to design a new staff survey after formerly asking questions which related to KPIs of managerial staff. A data bias occurred in staff responses meaning that all the staff survey data had to be interpreted/used with extreme caution due to the questionable validity of the data | Failure to provide useful data Alienation of staff as respondents | Hold pre-survey focus groups to establish pressing issues requiring investigation in the staff survey Consider historical data for trend comparisons |
| The employee survey doesn’t align with the culture of your organisation or the culture your organisation aspires to Example: a new HR director implemented a staff survey which used acronyms not yet widely known throughout the organisation. The result was that staff skipped staff survey items rendering data of questionable validity | Staff will not know how to answer questions and may not complete the staff survey or skip items | Tailor the staff survey items into familiar language Write some staff survey items which are unique to your organisational context Use open-ended staff survey questions to invite employees’ opinions; as well as providing insights. This may increase staff engagement by helping them feel that they have been listened to |
| Using an incorrect staff survey scale or method of data collection Example: When moving from one staff survey provider to another the response scale may change; mathematical formulae can sometimes be applied to address this; please contact us to speak to our registered psychologists and research experts | New data statistically incomparable with previous employee survey data | Retain same types of quantitative scale for areas where direct comparisons are required with previous employee survey responses e.g. when comparing rankings of corporate values |
| Cross cultural issues caused by insensitive translation of staff survey content Example: An FMCG client conducted a global staff survey without the necessary content quality controls; some of the staff survey questions/items simply failed to translate meaning, staff didn’t understand the question so skipped it | Alienation of some employee survey respondents | Following translation of the staff survey content, conduct a pilot survey or sense check at the local level to ensure translations are correct |
Survey in field | ||
Issue | Problems it causes | Mitigating actions |
| Respondents participating for the wrong reasons Example: A newsagency tried to boost staff survey participation rates by offering respondents a voucher for a nearby cafe; staff clicked through the long, laborious survey quickly to gain the voucher without giving due consideration to their responses | Staff survey data bias | Avoid linking KPIs or other financial incentives to the staff survey, a charity donation can work well instead |
| Staff survey can’t be completed by parts of the workforce Examples: Electronic surveys that have been distributed during periods of system interruption due to IT systems upgrades. Surveys that have been mailed to staff at home with no spare copies available when staff are at work near the designated drop-boxes | Low staff survey response rates Missing useful/vital data from some demographic groups Alienating groups of employees | Distribute your staff survey via multiple communications channels Ensure that paper-based staff surveys with a robust collection method are available even in organisational areas in which staff normally work via a computer |
Analysis of survey data | ||
Issue | Problems it causes | Mitigating actions |
| Trend analysis: comparing current staff survey data to previous data collected differently Example: An education sector client tried to make direct comparisons between qualitative data findings and those collected from a quantitative staff survey | Invalidity of staff survey data | Employee survey interpretation must consider: – Previous response rates – Previous organisational context – Previous external context – Like-for-like scales – Like-for-like methods of analysis – Like-for-like demographics and corporate structuring |
| Failure to address cultural response bias in the staff survey Example: Global travel client who was surprised at the high level of staff turnover in one country despite the fact that this country had recorded positive sentiment in a recent staff survey | Misinterpretation of seemingly similar staff survey data | Apply knowledge of cultural understanding to interpretation of staff survey data before action planning |
Interpretation of staff survey data | ||
Issue | Problems it causes | Mitigating actions |
| Launching the staff survey survey “too soon after the dust has settled” from corporate changes Example: A finance sector client who received staff feedback seeking answers to information which was currently filtering through their internal communications cascade | Bias response/data of limited validity | Following a corporate process restructuring, and before running the staff survey, enable new functional teams to embed and go through the group dynamics of storming, norming and performing |
| Failure to look externally at competitors’ staff survey results Example: A marketing team who were shocked and surprised to learn that despite a year-on-year improvement in % favourable scores in their own staff survey; when benchmarked against similar organisations their results were in the bottom decile of a standard distribution comparison | Missing the big picture | Benchmark employee survey data against a dynamic and relevant database in addition to scrutinising your own results |
Post survey | ||
Issue | Problems it causes | Mitigating actions |
| Reporting employee survey findings to the wrong staff members Example: An organisation who fed internal staff survey results directly back to line managers rather than filtering through their HR department; within an hour, selected parts of the results had been published by staff on the intranet; taken out of context and in isolation, some of these results made alarming headlines | Misinterpretation of employee survey data Misuse of staff survey data e.g. managers seeking out and berating staff for responses they think they have given | Prevention is better than cure:Swift but vital sense-check of employee survey data by HR manager Sensitive information cascade De-identification of all qualitative responses Listen to guidance from an independent third party survey provider, who wouldn’t approve of this to happen |
| Lack of post-survey communications Example: Too many action items. A lot of organisations that approach Insync for the first time cite that little to nothing was done with the results of the last staff survey. These same organisations often state that a key outcome of success would be to boost or at least retain participation levels | Increased staff scepticism re: the employee survey motivations Decreased employee engagement Cycle of lowered response rates for the staff survey begins again | *See Insync’s article on employee survey communication |
| Mistakes in employee survey data/data interpretation Example: A client made a mistake in the internal data analysis for their previous staff surveys and feared that a new survey would lack credibility even though they now had a professional provider | Staff mistrust in the staff survey Future withdrawal from employee research | With careful management this issue was used to facilitate focus groups to involve managers in communicating intention and results of the next staff survey Swift action by HR team following the staff survey Don’t try and cover anything up with your employee survey results Apologise, be honest and explain how mistakes could have occurred Publish correct information in a timely manner |
| Hiding bad news from the employee survey Example: When unfavourable staff survey results for a new executive were revealed the HR department decided not to feed this back. | Promotes future mistrust of the organisation Doesn’t help the new manager on a path to improvement and lets down employees who took the time to provide constructive feedback via the staff survey | Use the staff survey as a platform for explaining how things will be changing Offer this executive a 360 feedback survey to help them grow as a leader |
| Issue | Problems it causes | Mitigating actions |
|---|---|---|
| Launching the employee survey (or previous surveys) at the wrong time Example: Client X had launched an employee survey when unaddressed rumours existed among staff about an imminent corporate restructure | Bias response/data of limited validity | Don’t plan your staff survey as a stand-alone HR initiative but make it an organisation-wide project Address employees’ concerns about the restructure and survey a month or two later |
Having recently changed mobile phone provider I optimistically began a fixed price contract happily envisaging what I'd do with all my saved dollars - big mistake! ...
The following article gives you an insight into how you can use an employee survey to improve employee engagement, improve competitiveness and make smart decisions ...
Organisational research has long debated the nature and strength of the relationship between job attitudes (e.g., job satisfaction and organisational commitment) and ...
Ground-breaking research into the 5 key people drivers of the profitable growth cycle based on our experience from conducting over 1000 employee and customer surveys ...
We use cookies to enhance your experience. Further use is considered consent. You can read more about cookies in our Privacy Policy.
You’ll always get a real person when you contact Insync.
Let's get started